What makes this particular rath, or ringfort, quietly strange is not simply its age but the layering of purposes it has accumulated: a prehistoric or early medieval enclosure that was later sliced in two by a field wall, its original bank pressed into service as a field boundary, its identity as a distinct monument gradually blurred by agricultural pragmatism.

A rath is an earthen ringfort, typically dating from the early medieval period, used as a farmstead enclosed by one or more banks and ditches. This example is univallate, meaning it has a single enclosing bank, and measures roughly 19.5 metres north to south and 25.5 metres east to west. The entrance, a gap 1.75 metres wide on the eastern side, is likely original; a second, less defined gap to the south-south-west appears to be a later addition. The bank itself behaves as terrain would expect: on the downhill southern side it rises 1.5 metres above the exterior but only 0.4 metres above the interior, while on the uphill northern side the proportions reverse. Drystone revetment, that is, dry-laid stone walling used to stabilise an earthen face, reinforces the outer edge of the bank on the southern and south-eastern arc. During the 19th century, a north-to-south field wall was driven through the enclosure, dividing it into two unequal portions, and another wall was laid along the top of the bank in the north-eastern sector. The site sits roughly 75 metres east of a cashel, a stone-built enclosure of broadly comparable function, making this a rare instance of two distinct enclosure types in close proximity on the same mountain slope. Two grass-covered mounds of stone rest against the eastern face of the dividing wall; their origin remains unexplained.