It measures roughly six metres east to west and five metres north to south, with a doorway less than a metre wide facing east, the direction that would have caught the morning light and deflected the prevailing Atlantic wind. The wall that defines it is a double-skinned construction, an inner and outer row of upright stones set side by side, with rubble packed between them and now capped by grass. At its best-preserved stretch, running from the north-west around to the north-east, the wall still stands to around forty centimetres, with a thickness of one point four metres, suggesting the original structure had some solidity to it. The western part of the interior sits noticeably higher than the eastern, raised by about ninety centimetres, which may reflect deliberate levelling into a slope, a practical measure on uneven ground.

The hut does not sit alone. It occupies the western half of a larger enclosure, itself set within the remains of an ancient field system, both of which survive in the same landscape. This kind of clustering, a dwelling placed inside a defined boundary, within a broader pattern of land division, points to a organised agricultural settlement rather than a temporary or isolated camp. Such arrangements are found across early medieval Ireland, where small farmsteads were often enclosed within a roughly circular or oval boundary, known as a ringfort or ráth when earthen, or a cashel when built of stone. The relationship between this hut, its enclosure, and the surrounding field system suggests they formed parts of the same working landscape, though precisely when that landscape was in active use is not recorded.