What makes this particular example quietly interesting is not its grandeur but its layering: two separate phases of human occupation are legible here within a relatively compact area, one cutting into the other, leaving the landscape as a kind of slow-motion palimpsest.

A ringfort is typically a roughly circular enclosure defined by an earthen bank and, in many cases, an outer ditch, known as a fosse, designed to pen livestock and provide a degree of security around a farmstead. When surveyors described this one in 1971, they recorded a subcircular enclosure roughly 39 metres in diameter, bounded by a low bank and an external fosse. The bank has been worn in places almost to a scarp, partly through the attentions of grazing animals over the centuries, and a causeway on the eastern side, around 3.4 metres wide overall, appears to mark where the original entrance stood. What complicates the picture is the western half of the interior, where a suboval house site sits within the ringfort's footprint. Its own small fosse actually cuts through the fosse of the ringfort, indicating that this structure arrived later, a second occupation reshaping the remains of the first. About 12 metres to the west lies a further rectangular enclosure or house site, adding another element to what is, on the surface, an unremarkable patch of wet field. A Preservation Order was placed on the monument in February 1975, a recognition that even a worn and partially defaced earthwork carries archaeological significance that grazing pressure alone cannot be allowed to settle.