Embanked enclosure, Plattinstown, Co. Wexford
Co. Wexford |
Ringforts
Walk the field at Plattinstown and you would notice nothing unusual.
The ground is level, the pasture unremarkable, the landscape low-lying and quiet. Yet somewhere beneath the grass, the ghost of a substantial earthwork persists, invisible to anyone standing on it but legible from the air as a clear cropmark, the buried bank and ditches causing the vegetation above them to dry out at a different rate to the surrounding soil, leaving a pale signature that only becomes readable when seen from altitude.
The enclosure was recorded on the Ordnance Survey six-inch map of 1839, described there as a subrectangular or D-shaped earthwork, roughly 70 metres along its north-east to south-west axis and around 50 metres across. When aerial photographs taken as part of the Ordnance Survey Ireland vertical survey series in 2000 were examined, the site resolved into something slightly more complex: a sub-rectangular or pentagonal shape, defined by the parch-mark of an earthen bank up to ten metres wide, with evidence of both an inner and an outer ditch. That kind of enclosure form, a raised bank with surrounding ditches, is characteristic of a rath, the ringfort type that served as a farmstead enclosure across Ireland from roughly the early medieval period onward. The site had previously been classified as a moated site, a different category entirely. Moated sites are typically medieval, Anglo-Norman in origin, defined by water-filled ditches around a raised platform, and associated with manorial settlement from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The revised view, that Plattinstown is more likely a rath than a moated site, shifts it considerably further back in time, though without excavation the precise date remains uncertain.
The reclassification matters because County Wexford saw intensive Anglo-Norman colonisation, and distinguishing between native Irish enclosures and later plantation-era earthworks helps build a clearer picture of how the landscape was shaped and by whom. A cropmark site with no surface expression offers no obvious reason to stop, but it is a reminder that the most significant archaeology is often the kind you cannot see at all.