The fact that both stones are quartz is worth pausing on. Quartz was not simply the nearest available material; across prehistoric Ireland and Britain, quartz was repeatedly chosen for monuments and burial sites in ways that suggest it carried some deliberate significance, possibly connected to its brightness or reflective quality in low light. Whatever the intention behind these particular stones, the pairing and alignment point to the kind of careful, purposeful placement that archaeologists associate with prehistoric ritual landscapes.

The stones came to wider attention relatively recently, emerging from the peat during turf-cutting, and they remain only partially excavated from the bog that had been preserving and concealing them. The northern stone is subrectangular in plan and stands to a height of more than a metre; the southern stone, rectangular and measuring 1.65 metres, now lies prostrate. Whether it fell over time or was always placed flat is unclear. Their position crowning a prominent hill rather than a valley floor suggests they were meant to be seen from a distance, or perhaps that the site itself had significance as a high place. The arrangement was documented by Seán Ó Nualláin in 1988, whose survey work catalogued paired standing stones across Ireland and identified recurring patterns in their spacing and orientation.