Or rather, there was one recorded, named, and then effectively lost. By the time surveyors went looking, no visible surface trace remained, and the ground kept whatever it holds to itself.

What makes this site quietly odd is the paper trail rather than any physical presence. The second edition of the Ordnance Survey six-inch map, published in 1899, names the burial, which suggests it was locally known and considered significant enough to warrant inclusion in the cartographic record. Yet the mapmakers did not mark it with any symbol or indicator, only the name, floating above the landscape without an anchor. That gap between naming and locating points to something that may already have been half-forgotten by the late nineteenth century, remembered in local knowledge but not firmly pinned to a spot. Whether the original monument was a prehistoric grave, a marked mound, or something more modest, the notes do not say, and the ground, when examined, offered no clarification.