The stone at Knocknacurragh in north Cork, roughly 1.5 metres long and of substantial girth, was removed from its original position around 1983 and now lies beside a field fence on a south-facing slope of pasture. Whatever upright presence it once held in the landscape has been reduced to a recumbent slab at a field boundary, ignored by the Ordnance Survey maps of 1842 and 1904, which recorded no trace of it at all.

The stone may be one of three recorded in this townland by a researcher named Bowman in 1934, who noted the dimensions of each with the kind of careful informality typical of early twentieth-century field antiquarians. He listed them by the names of the landowners on whose ground they sat: one in C.M. O'Connor's holding stood 2 feet 2 inches high with a circumference of 5 feet 3 inches; another in T. O'Sullivan's measured 3 feet 1 inch with a girth of 87 inches; a third in P. O'Donoghue's came in at 2 feet 9 inches with a girth of 7 feet 11 inches. These are modest but not insignificant stones, the kind scattered across Cork's rural interior, planted upright at some point in prehistoric antiquity for reasons that remain genuinely unclear. The Knocknacurragh stone fits plausibly within that group, though which of the three it might correspond to, or whether it is something else entirely, is not established.

What is certain is that the stone's displacement sometime in the early 1980s severed whatever relationship it had with its original setting. A standing stone, the term used for a single prehistoric upright, derives much of its archaeological meaning from its position in the ground and its orientation within the surrounding terrain. Lying flat beside a fence, it retains its mass and its age, but the context that might explain why it was placed where it was has been lost.