The example at Rylane, in mid-Cork, departs quietly from that pattern. Here, a larger stone is adjoined by a noticeably smaller one, the two set at slightly different orientations, creating an arrangement that feels less like a lone monument and more like a conversation arrested in stone.

The main stone stands roughly a metre tall and is subrectangular in plan, meaning its cross-section is broadly rectangular rather than tapering to a point, with its long axis running east to west. Beside it sits a second, shorter stone, only sixty centimetres high, its long axis shifted slightly to an east-northeast and west-southwest alignment. What precisely the relationship between the two stones is, and whether they were raised at the same time or in different periods, remains unknown. What is clear is that neither stone was considered significant enough to be recorded by the Ordnance Survey when their surveyors mapped this part of Cork in 1842, which means the pair either escaped notice during that meticulous national project or were not yet visible above ground at the time. That absence from the historical record gives the site an extra layer of quiet obscurity, a prehistoric monument that slipped, unannounced, past one of the most thorough cartographic exercises nineteenth-century Ireland ever undertook.