The result, still readable in the landscape today, is a hut site eight metres in diameter, its interior raised by around 1.2 metres along the eastern arc and cut roughly a metre into the hillside at the west, the two interventions working against each other to produce a flat, usable surface. It is a small engineering problem solved with quiet competence, and the solution has outlasted whatever structure once stood on top of it.

The site sits on a steep east-facing slope on the southern bank of a stream, the kind of sheltered, well-watered position that would have made practical sense to whoever chose it. The raised eastern arc is held in place by a revetment, a retaining face of stacked stone, though that wall is now collapsing. Hut sites of this kind are broadly prehistoric or early medieval in date, though without excavation it is impossible to say more precisely when this one was occupied or by whom. What the physical evidence does confirm is deliberate construction rather than natural formation: someone cut into this hillside, built up the opposite side, and faced the exposed earth with stone to keep it from slipping away.