Two of the stones stand just 4.8 metres apart, which is close enough to suggest a deliberate pairing, yet the third sits a full 19.4 metres away to the north-east, an arrangement too irregular to fit neatly into any standard prehistoric monument type. That awkwardness of classification is built into its official designation: not a stone row, not a stone circle, but an "anomalous stone group".

The three stones are aligned roughly north-east to south-west. The tallest, at 1.77 metres, stands in the middle, while the south-western stone, at 1.6 metres, leans noticeably to the east. The north-eastern stone is the shortest of the three at 1.2 metres, and roughly oval in cross-section. What makes the site's history of interpretation particularly interesting is that early Ordnance Survey maps, from both 1842 and 1903, marked the stones as a "cromlech", a term historically applied to megalithic tomb structures, suggesting that nineteenth-century surveyors understood them quite differently. A later researcher, Winde, proposed that the stones once formed segments of a much larger circle, an idea recorded by the archaeologist Ó Nualláin in 1984. If that reading is correct, what survives today may be a fragment of something considerably more ambitious, the rest of it lost to time, agriculture, or deliberate removal.

The stones stand in pasture on a gentle north-west-facing slope, which makes them accessible to the eye if not always to the foot, depending on the season and the state of the ground. The tallest stone in particular is substantial enough to be visible at a reasonable distance across the field.