What makes it quietly puzzling is that, despite its obvious ecclesiastical associations, almost nothing survives that can confirm what exactly it once was. The slightly curved line of the southern enclosure wall hints that an earlier, possibly circular, boundary preceded the present one, circular enclosures being a common feature of early Irish ecclesiastical sites. Whether anything of that older arrangement remains beneath the turf is unknown.

The most substantial feature within the field is a ruined rectangular structure tucked into its north-eastern corner, measuring roughly six metres by three and a half metres internally. Its walls have collapsed into low, grass-covered mounds of stone, no more than half a metre high in places, with a single facing stone still holding its position in the north wall. A narrow gap in the southern wall, around sixty centimetres wide, may mark a former entrance. The building has previously been identified as a church, a suggestion recorded by a researcher named Curran, though nothing diagnostic of ecclesiastical architecture has survived to settle the matter. Elsewhere in the field, a handful of stones set upright on their edges are visible in the eastern sector, and a solitary upright stone in the north-east corner may once have formed one side of an entrance into the enclosure. The remainder of the field was apparently under cultivation at some point in its history. Perhaps the most quietly evocative find here is the lower disc of a rotary quern, a hand-powered grinding stone used for milling grain, discovered lying against the southern field wall, a domestic object in an ambiguous sacred space. The site was documented in J. Cuppage's 1986 archaeological survey of the Dingle Peninsula, Corca Dhuibhne, which remains the principal published source for the area.