No ruins mark the spot, no carved stone catches the eye; the site survives mainly as local memory, the kind of knowledge passed between neighbours rather than fixed in mortar or manuscript.

The existence of a church here rests on oral tradition and a single published reference. A 1986 work by O Donoghue recorded an "old church and burial ground" in the townland, though he placed it in the north-east rather than the north-west, where local information suggests it actually lies. Whether the two accounts describe the same spot from different vantage points, or whether there is some genuine confusion about which corner of the field is meant, remains unresolved. It is a small discrepancy, but telling: when a site leaves so faint a physical impression, even its location becomes approximate, dependent on who you ask and when.