That quiet contradiction is more or less all that survives of it: a cartographic footnote and a burial ground that once gave it context.

The site's paper trail is thin but telling. Neither the 1842 nor the 1904 Ordnance Survey six-inch maps show any church here, which suggests that by the mid-nineteenth century the building had already vanished from the landscape in any meaningful sense. Yet the 1937 OS six-inch revision placed a church marking within the associated burial ground, raising the question of what the surveyors thought they were recording. Writing in 1934, a researcher named Bowman was unambiguous: no sign of the church remained. It is possible the 1937 cartographers were working from earlier or incomplete sources, or simply indicating that a church had once stood there rather than that one still did. Either way, the building itself had gone, leaving only the graveyard as a frame around an absence.

The site is noted as overgrown and inaccessible, so there is little to see in any conventional sense. The burial ground itself remains a separate recorded feature, but the church it once accompanied has left nothing above ground to examine.