Not a gravestone, not a church ornament, but a freestanding cross significant enough to be recorded by name in 1608, and then, at some point thereafter, lost entirely to the documentary and physical record. No precise location has been established. It survives only as a single line in the historical literature, a feature that was once considered worth noting and is now considered impossible to pin down.

The sole reference comes from Clarke's 2002 study, which records the cross as existing in 1608 without specifying where exactly it stood or what form it took. Freestanding stone crosses were a common enough feature of the medieval Irish urban and rural landscape, serving as waymarkers, boundary indicators, devotional objects, or gathering points. They were frequently removed, reused as building material, or simply allowed to decay once their immediate function was forgotten or their religious associations became inconvenient during periods of religious and political upheaval. Dublin's south city, which underwent significant redevelopment across the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, would have offered many opportunities for such a feature to disappear without leaving a clear trace in the landscape or the archive.

There is, practically speaking, nothing to visit here. The cross is an absence rather than a presence, and the most a curious person can do is walk the older streets of Dublin's south city with the knowledge that something once stood somewhere underfoot or nearby, recorded once in 1608 and not reliably mentioned again. It is the kind of detail that rewards those who read footnotes, a small reminder that the historical record is full of objects and structures that were once substantial enough to deserve a name but not substantial enough to survive.