That ambiguity is itself the most interesting thing about it. Archaeologists cannot say with confidence whether this is the remnant of a barrow, a burial mound typically constructed to mark a grave, or simply the eroded footprint of an ancient house site.

The earthwork is subcircular in plan, measuring roughly 14.5 metres north to south and 12 metres east to west. A low bank of earth and stone traces its outline, though farmers clearing their fields over the years have piled additional material against it, making it difficult to read the original form. Within the interior, a central depression roughly 3.5 metres in diameter is still visible at ground level. That hollow is one of the few details that has survived the slow burial of the structure, and it is the kind of feature that keeps the barrow interpretation alive; collapsed burial chambers and robbed-out cists can leave exactly this kind of dip. But a sunken area at the centre of a former dwelling, where a hearth once sat or where the floor compacted differently from the surrounding ground, is equally plausible.