It does not appear on the Ordnance Survey Ireland historic six-inch maps, which were surveyed across the nineteenth century and are generally reliable for earthworks of any antiquity. Its absence from those maps is one of the details that makes it genuinely puzzling, because the feature is visible and substantial enough to be noticed.

When the Archaeological Survey of Ireland recorded the earthwork in 2007, they described a raised rectangular-shaped area measuring roughly 15.3 metres northwest to southeast and 6.5 metres northeast to southwest, enclosed by a steep bank roughly 13.7 metres wide. The internal height reaches about 1.05 metres, while the exterior height rises to around 2 metres, dropping to a steep scarp on the sides away from the northwest. The site is classed as of doubtful antiquity, meaning surveyors were not convinced it originated in any recognised prehistoric or early medieval period. About 60 metres to the west lies a possible barrow, the term used for a burial mound of prehistoric origin, recorded separately as LI033-169. Whether the two features are related in any meaningful way remains unclear. A narrow local road runs immediately to the east of the earthwork on a northeast-southwest alignment and, according to the historic Ordnance Survey maps, leads to a limekiln and quarry marked under the name Carrigeenanoosh. A limekiln was used to burn limestone to produce quicklime, typically for agricultural or building purposes, and such features were common across rural Ireland from the seventeenth century onward. The presence of quarrying activity in the immediate area is worth bearing in mind when considering what the earthwork might actually represent.

The site sits in working agricultural land, so access is not straightforward and any visit should be approached with care and appropriate permission from landowners. The rectangular form is visible on aerial orthophotos taken between 2005 and 2012, and on Google Earth imagery dated November 2018, which gives a reasonable sense of its shape before visiting in person. Those with an interest in landscape archaeology will find the comparison between the aerial record and the absence of any historic map trace genuinely instructive, even if the feature itself resists easy interpretation.