It sits roughly twenty metres east of a watercourse, rising between 3.6 and 4.2 metres from the surrounding ground, with a flat summit stretching somewhere between 19.5 and 20 metres across and a base of approximately 27.4 metres. What makes it quietly odd is the detail Westropp noticed over a century ago: a ledge running around the eastern foot of the mound, the kind of feature more commonly associated with bell barrows, a prehistoric burial form in which a low flat platform encircles the base of a central mound. That detail, combined with the dry fosse, a surrounding ditch now without water, about 4.6 metres wide, places this somewhere between a Norman motte and something considerably older, without the record clearly resolving which.

Thomas Johnson Westropp, the tireless late nineteenth and early twentieth century antiquarian who documented monuments across Munster, listed this as site 4 in a survey published between 1917 and 1919. He noted its position near the Elton road and recorded the dimensions with the kind of careful attention that makes his fieldwork still useful more than a hundred years on. He also observed that there is no outer ring, which is worth noting because many mottes, the flat-topped earthen mounds built by Norman lords as the base for a timber tower, are accompanied by an adjoining enclosure called a bailey. The absence of one here leaves the function and date of the mound genuinely open. The Ordnance Survey's 25-inch map depicted it as a raised circular platform defined by a scarp and fosse, and aerial photography from January 2003 shows its form from above, though by September 2019 Google Earth imagery recorded it as heavily overgrown, with a field boundary running east to west cutting across its southern edge.

The monument is in agricultural land and not a formal heritage site with public access, so anyone hoping to view it should seek landowner permission before approaching. The hawthorns Westropp mentioned growing on its sides are likely still present and may now be considerably denser, which would make the shape harder to read from ground level. The aerial view, available through historical imagery layers on mapping tools, gives a clearer sense of the circular platform than a field visit might. The southern field boundary that intersects the monument is visible in recent imagery and serves as a useful locating detail when trying to identify the mound from the road.