That last detail is quietly odd. Most early ecclesiastical sites have some discernible point of access, however ruined. Here, nothing of the kind survives, or perhaps nothing was ever meant to be obvious. The enclosure measures 32 metres square internally, which gives it a compact, deliberate footprint, and its interior is not simply an empty yard but a structured space, divided and furnished in ways that suggest a long and layered history of use.

The southern boundary is built from a rubble wall about a metre wide, faced on both sides with upright slabs, a technique also used along the southern sections of the east and west walls. The northern parts of the enclosure are defined by a more recent stone wall, suggesting the site was maintained or reused at different periods. Inside, an east-west row of intermittent upright slabs runs across the enclosure roughly ten metres from its northern edge, creating a kind of internal threshold. South of this row sit two conjoined huts and a leacht, which is a low commemorative cairn or platform of stones associated with early Christian devotional practice, and the leacht is topped by a stone cross. Most telling is what occupies the south-east quadrant: a large number of uninscribed upright slabs that scholars O'Sullivan and Sheehan, writing in 1996, interpreted as the remains of a ceallúnach. A ceallúnach is an unconsecrated burial ground, often used for those excluded from formal Christian burial, such as unbaptised infants or strangers, and its presence here suggests this enclosure served a community over a considerable span of time, fulfilling functions both devotional and funerary that did not always sit easily within orthodox church structures.