What makes this particular structure worth attention is less its size than its construction: the boundary wall, roughly 1.8 metres wide, is built from stone slabs set on their sides rather than stacked horizontally, a method that gives the whole thing an irregular, almost improvised character. The enclosure itself is not large, measuring approximately 23 metres on its longer axis and 18 metres across, and its shape is anything but regular.

The site sits within a multiperiod field system, meaning the surrounding landscape carries the accumulated traces of agricultural organisation from more than one distinct era, layers of boundary-making that archaeologists read like a slow palimpsest. From this enclosure, curvilinear slab walls extend outward to the west-southwest and east-northeast, while a rectangular field opens off its northwestern side and appears to belong to the broader field system of which the enclosure forms a part. The whole arrangement was already old enough to be recorded on the 1916 edition of the Ordnance Survey six-inch map, though the enclosure itself almost certainly predates that documentation by a considerable margin. A north-south routeway has since cut through the site, and the damage is significant; the enclosure as it survives today is a truncated version of whatever was originally here, its edges severed by a path or track that paid no particular attention to what lay beneath its course.

Views from the site are restricted despite its elevation, which is itself a minor curiosity. Visitors approaching the area should expect rough pasture underfoot and be aware that the surviving fabric of the enclosure is loose and fragile; the slabs are not mortared, and the wall's character is easy to misread as a collapsed or casual boundary rather than a deliberate architectural form.