Enclosure, Ballyreesode, Co. Limerick
Co. Limerick |
Enclosures
In a field in Ballyreesode, County Limerick, there is an oval shape pressed into the earth that most people would walk past without a second thought.
It is not marked by a sign or a fence, and it was not discovered by excavation or local tradition but by somebody looking down at a photograph taken from the air. That aerial perspective revealed something the ground-level view conceals entirely: a ditched enclosure roughly 40 metres by 22 metres, with what appears to be a rectangular annexe attached to its south-western end, measuring approximately 25 metres by 20 metres.
The site was identified through the Bruff Survey, recorded on Map 23 as Bruff 45, from aerial photograph reference AP 5/2059. It was described and assessed by Doody in 2008, who noted that the overall morphology, meaning the shape and layout of the enclosure and its attached annexe, points towards a possible Bronze Age origin. A ditched enclosure of this type would typically have been formed by digging a boundary ditch around a defined area, the upcast soil sometimes forming a bank on the inner or outer edge. Such enclosures were used across prehistoric Ireland for a range of purposes, from settlement to animal management to ceremonial use, and the presence of an annexe, a secondary enclosure joined to the main one, is a feature sometimes associated with farmsteads or enclosed landholdings from that period. The compilation of the record is credited to Denis Power, and the entry was uploaded in November 2013.
Because the enclosure was identified from aerial photography rather than ground survey or excavation, visiting the site requires a degree of patience and a careful reading of the landscape. The features are likely to be most visible as cropmarks or soil marks, conditions that appear when differential moisture or growth in the vegetation above a buried ditch reflects what lies beneath. Late spring or a dry summer spell tend to produce the clearest surface expressions of this kind. There has been no published excavation of the site, so its date and function remain provisional, resting on morphological comparison rather than material evidence.