What makes it quietly compelling is the way it refuses easy categorisation. It is not quite a ringfort, not quite a field system, but a layered complex of ancient and more recent activity, where prehistoric or early medieval stonework and a repurposed sheep shelter share the same ground without obvious contradiction.

The main enclosure forms an arc running roughly east-south-east to west-north-west, built from a double line of upright, closely-set stone slabs with a grass-covered rubble core. The wall stands no more than 0.8 metres at its highest and reaches about 1.5 metres in width. Where the arc meets the western side, the builders made use of existing rock outcrop rather than laying further stone, a practical economy that suggests familiarity with the land rather than any grand plan. The entrance, just 1.4 metres wide, is defined by two upright slabs set at right angles to the bank, a simple but deliberate threshold. Inside, a circular hut site, roughly five metres across, sits against the rock outcrop on the western edge, its outer face still defined by a low stone bank. A small sub-rectangular enclosure, about four metres by three, attaches itself to the outer edge of the main structure to the east-south-east, with its own narrow entrance to the north-east. The entire complex occupies the south-western corner of a larger rectangular field outlined by a rough stone boundary, with further disused field divisions traceable to the south. The modern walling added to the south-west corner tells its own story; at some point, whoever was working this hill found the old stones convenient enough to press back into use as a sheep shelter, layering one era of pastoral life directly onto another.