The enclosure is roughly circular, measuring about 26 metres north to south and 24 metres east to west, but it carries none of the confident legibility of a well-preserved monument. Dense overgrowth and centuries of weathering have reduced it to something that, from a distance, might barely register as anything at all.

What the ground does preserve, partially, is a stony bank that varies considerably as it traces the circuit. At the south-west, it widens to around four metres and retains what appears to be the remnant of a wall along its inner face, suggesting something more deliberate was once built here. Elsewhere the bank narrows and degrades, dropping to heights of less than half a metre. Inside the enclosure, bedrock breaks through the turf in the south-west quadrant, and a loose scatter of stones lies across the interior. In the northern half, a small sub-circular feature, roughly five to six metres across, is outlined by a narrow ring of stones; what it represents is unclear. Ordnance Survey mapping adds another layer of ambiguity: the 1837 six-inch map shows a roughly semicircular arc of field boundaries at this location, while the 1930 edition records a circular hachured enclosure, a cartographic convention used to indicate an earthwork or raised feature. Whether those two depictions describe the same thing in different states, or reflect different interpretations by different surveyors, is not easily resolved. Approximately 250 metres to the north-west lies a rath, the term for a circular earthen enclosure typically associated with early medieval settlement in Ireland, which raises the possibility that this site and its neighbour were once part of the same broader landscape of activity, though no firm connection has been established.

The poor state of preservation, combined with the overgrowth, means that even close inspection leaves the enclosure's original purpose open. It may have been a settlement feature, a field enclosure, or something else entirely. It sits in ordinary farmland, unremarked, doing what eroded archaeology so often does: offering just enough to prompt a question it cannot quite answer.