The enclosure, roughly forty metres across its north-south axis, retains the remains of an earthen bank that has largely subsided into a scarp, with faint traces of an external fosse, the shallow defensive ditch that would originally have run around its outer edge. What makes the site particularly curious is not just the enclosure itself but the broader pattern it belongs to: a larger, roughly circular enclosure appears to surround it, defined by two scarps with an intervening fosse, and small field banks radiate outward from a rectangular house site positioned just to the south-west.

The earliest detailed record of this arrangement comes from the 1837 edition of the Ordnance Survey six-inch map, which shows the D-shaped enclosure with its characteristic straight western side and the outline of the rectangular house site roughly twenty metres to its south-west. By the time the revised twenty-five-inch map was produced in 1910, the house site had disappeared from the cartographic record entirely, though the enclosure itself was still marked. That slippage between the two surveys, one feature present and then gone, is a small reminder of how incompletely the landscape was captured even in the age of systematic mapping. Traces of cultivation ridges running north to south are still visible inside the larger enclosure, suggesting that the ground was actively worked at some point, though precisely when remains an open question. The site sits within a cluster of monuments: a church and graveyard lie roughly three hundred metres to the west, and a motte and bailey with an associated castle, the motte being a Norman-era raised earthen mound typically topped with a timber or stone structure, sits around four hundred and thirty-five metres to the south-south-west. Together they hint at a locality that was, at various periods, both inhabited and organised in ways the current quiet farmland does little to suggest.