What makes this particular enclosure quietly interesting is the way its boundary refuses to commit to a single construction method. Moving around the perimeter, you encounter three distinct types of boundary in sequence: a stone bank running from the south-east around to the west-south-west, which gives way to a low scarp continuing north-westward, and then a straight wall carrying the line around to the north-north-east. The result is a boundary that reads almost like a palimpsest, different builders or different moments leaving their mark on the same circuit.

The enclosure measures roughly 32 metres east to west and 27 metres north to south, with the defining bank reaching about 1.8 metres in width. On the interior the bank barely registers above ground level, rising only around 0.3 metres, while on the exterior it stands closer to 0.8 metres high, and a short stretch of outer facing stonework survives on the southern side to a height of about half a metre. That asymmetry between interior and exterior height is typical of an enclosure where the bank was built up from material thrown outward rather than raised symmetrically, and it hints at a concern with defining or controlling access rather than purely with creating an internal platform. Near the north-east of the interior, the foundations of a house survive, though their date remains uncertain. Two further enclosures lie approximately 90 metres to the south-east, suggesting that whatever activity took place here was not isolated but part of a broader organised landscape. The views from the site are wide in every direction, most extensively to the west, which may or may not have mattered to the people who built here, but the elevation would certainly have made this a visible and visually commanding location.