It measures just over thirty-three metres across, and its boundary wall, now reduced to little more than half a metre in height and buried under sod, only announces itself properly where large limestone boulders break the surface. What makes this place quietly anomalous is not its size or its form, both of which are typical of the circular enclosures found across the Irish countryside, but the fact that it never appeared on any edition of the Ordnance Survey six-inch maps. These maps, produced from the 1830s onwards, were extraordinarily thorough in recording field boundaries, ruins, and earthworks across the country. To have escaped that documentation entirely suggests the enclosure was either already too degraded to catch a surveyor's eye, or that it was somehow absorbed into the working landscape without remark.

The enclosure itself occupies a patch of relatively level ground tucked between the outcrops, as though whoever built it chose the site for the natural shelter those rocky rises provided. The bank appears more substantial at the northeast, south-southwest, and northwest, precisely where it meets or backs onto the outcrops, suggesting the builders made deliberate use of the existing terrain rather than working against it. A later field wall has been built along the outer edge at the south and south-southwest, and a gap of around two and a half metres at the southwest now serves as tractor access, the most recent of several layers of agricultural use written into the landscape. Heaps of field clearance stones piled onto the natural outcrops nearby speak to reclamation work that has reshaped the surrounding ground, though the enclosure itself has survived. Traces of older activity cluster around it: a relict field boundary of a single row of stones runs along the south-southwest edge, and the remnants of what may be a field wall or scarp sit at the base of the rocky rise to the northwest. On top of the rise about twelve metres to the west, there is a possible hut site, and roughly a hundred and fifty metres to the southeast lie the traces of another possible enclosure and associated field walls. Taken together, these fragments hint at a small agricultural or settlement complex whose full extent and date remain unresolved.