Enclosure, Shanganagh Beg, Co. Laois
Co. Laois |
Enclosures
There is no trace of it above ground.
No earthwork, no standing stone, no hollow in the turf. The only way to see this circular enclosure in the townland of Shanganagh Beg is from the air, and even then it appears not as a structure but as a stain in a crop. Cropmarks like this form when buried ditches or pits alter the moisture and nutrient content of the soil above them, causing the plants growing overhead to ripen at a slightly different rate or colour than their neighbours. From altitude, the buried outline of a roughly circular ditch becomes briefly, seasonally legible. The enclosure near the centre of a tillage field in this quiet corner of County Laois measures approximately 49.72 metres north to south and 49.28 metres east to west, with a ditch estimated at between 1.8 and 2.5 metres wide tracing most of its circuit.
The site sits about 1.6 kilometres west of the River Barrow, which marks the boundary with County Kildare, in low-lying ground at around 67 metres above sea level. What makes the location particularly notable is not any single feature but the sheer density of similar sites clustered in the same townland. Aerial photography taken in 1990 revealed a concentration of cropmark enclosures, field systems, and a complex possible moated site, all within neighbouring fields of Shanganagh Beg. A moated site, in the Irish context, typically refers to a medieval farmstead surrounded by a water-filled ditch, often associated with Anglo-Norman settlement. Another cropmark enclosure lies just 70 metres to the north-east of this one. Together they suggest a landscape that was intensively organised and occupied over a long period, though the precise date and function of any individual site remains unknown without excavation. The enclosure itself was bisected at some point by a field boundary, visible on the first edition Ordnance Survey six-inch map of around 1838 and still present on the third edition of around 1909, though that boundary has since been removed.
The enclosure leaves no visible impression from the ground. The field is under tillage, and the ditch that defines the site survives only as a buried feature. No definitive entrance gap has been identified, which may simply reflect the limitations of the imagery rather than any architectural oddity. The eastern arc of the circle is more clearly resolved in satellite imagery than the western, a reminder that cropmarks are as much a function of weather, crop type, and the angle of the sun as they are of what lies beneath.
