A field wall, built at some point in the post-medieval period, runs directly over the older structure in every section, erasing the boundary between the archaeological and the everyday. What remains is an oval outline, roughly 20.5 metres east to west and 13.5 metres north to south, quietly persisting beneath centuries of agricultural reuse.

The site has attracted modest but genuinely interesting debate about what it actually was. Writing in 1871, the geologist G. H. Kinahan suggested it was probably a caher, the Irish term for a stone-walled ringfort of early medieval date, typically used as a defended farmstead. That interpretation would place it somewhere in the period between the fifth and twelfth centuries. But the discovery of a pair of saddle querns at the monument complicates the picture. Saddle querns, the simple curved grinding stones used to process grain by hand, are associated with prehistoric rather than early medieval activity in Ireland, and their presence here led Molloy and O'Connell, writing in 1987, to suggest the site may be considerably older than Kinahan assumed. The enclosing wall's near-total overlap with the later field boundary means the question is unlikely to be resolved without excavation. What sits on that hilltop is, in a genuine sense, an open archaeological question wrapped inside a farm boundary.