Rather than running in straight lines between obvious landmarks, it curves, branches, and doubles back on itself across the hillside in a way that suggests the logic of an older, more organic relationship between people and land.

The wall is modest in its physical presence, roughly 0.8 metres thick and surviving to a height of around 0.4 metres, but its layout is what makes it worth attention. Beginning at a hut site to the west, it extends eastward for about 16 metres before splitting into two branches: one running south-west for approximately 24 metres, another heading north-east for around 35 metres. The main wall continues east for a further 52 metres, then curves north-west for about 50 metres. Rubble has scattered downslope from the walls over time, which is typical of dry-stone construction on sloping ground where frost, rain, and gravity do slow, persistent work. The association with the adjacent hut site is significant. A curvilinear field boundary of this kind, attached directly to a settlement remains, points toward a system of small-scale enclosure, perhaps for keeping animals close to a dwelling or defining a cultivated plot against the open hillside. The curving form, rather than a rectilinear one, is a common feature of early medieval and prehistoric field systems in Ireland, where boundaries followed the contours of the land rather than imposing a geometric order on it.