What makes this complex quietly remarkable is the precision still visible in its construction: one field wall retains a deliberate gap framed by a pair of opposed standing slabs, an arrangement that speaks to careful, intentional design rather than casual enclosure. The whole complex occupies a position that would have offered both shelter from prevailing winds and a commanding view southward over the bay.

The two structures differ in form and in how well they have survived. The first is a sub-rectangular hut, now much collapsed, measuring roughly four metres by three, with upright slabs set to revet, or face, the internal wall surfaces; a small annex, around 2.3 metres by 1.5 metres, abuts it to the west. The second, at the northern end of the complex, is the more intact of the pair: a subcircular corbelled hut, meaning its roof was formed by progressively overlapping stone courses rather than timber or thatch, built directly into the hillside slope. Its wall still stands to 1.2 metres at its best-preserved northern side, and a possible entrance can be made out at the southeast. Immediately to the east of this hut lies a dense concentration of stone whose function remains uncertain, a detail that tends to be more honest about the limits of archaeological interpretation than many sites permit.