Field system, Kinsaley, Co. Dublin
Co. Dublin |
Ritual/Ceremonial
There is nothing to see at this site.
That is precisely what makes it interesting. Beneath a working crop field on the northern fringes of County Dublin, the outlines of what may be an ancient field system lie completely invisible to anyone standing on the ground, detectable only from above and only under the right atmospheric conditions, when differences in soil moisture and crop growth betray the presence of buried features beneath.
The site at Kinsaley came to the attention of archaeologists not through excavation or fieldwork in any traditional sense, but through commercial satellite photography. Crop marks visible on a DigitalGlobe orthoimage taken between 2011 and 2013 suggested the presence of an organised field system, along with a circular enclosure recorded separately in the Sites and Monuments Record as DU015-112. Crop marks form when buried ditches, walls, or banks affect how plants grow above them; crops over a filled-in ditch tend to grow taller and greener, while those over compacted stone or rubble may be stunted. The features were noted on a low east-west rise sitting at a relatively low point in the surrounding landscape, a subtle topographic detail that might once have made the location useful for drainage or boundary-marking. The record was compiled by David O'Connor and updated by Christine Baker, with the identification of the field system credited in part to T. Condit.
Because there are no visible remains at ground level, this is not a site where a visit yields much in the conventional sense. The land is under crop, and there is nothing to distinguish it from any other arable field in north County Dublin. The value here is more conceptual than experiential: the knowledge that the organised landscape of an earlier period survives, encoded in soil and root, just out of reach. For anyone interested in aerial archaeology or the SMR database, the DigitalGlobe imagery referenced in the record offers the clearest view of what is actually there, and the associated circular enclosure nearby adds context to what may have been a more complex and deliberate arrangement of the land than the quiet field suggests today.
