What makes it worth a second look is not dramatic stonework or obvious monument signage, but the layered evidence of how the site has been used, modified, and breached across different periods, each intervention leaving a slightly different scar on the bank.

When the site was formally described in 1968, surveyors recorded an overgrown earthen bank of considerable bulk, measuring nearly 8.7 metres at the base on the south-east side, with an internal height of 1.6 metres and an external height of 3.6 metres. Enclosing this bank on the outside was a flat-bottomed fosse, the term for a defensive ditch, which was waterlogged and showed signs of having been re-dug along the eastern to north-north-west arc, suggesting the earthwork was maintained or adapted at some point after its original construction. Three separate breaks punctuate the bank: a narrow gap of just over a metre at the west-south-west, described as fairly recent; a modernised entrance nearly 9 metres wide at the south-east; and an older breach of around 10 metres at the south-west. That last opening, wider and less tidy than the others, hints at a much earlier disturbance, though the record does not say when or why it occurred. Together, these interruptions give the earthwork an almost biographical quality, a structure that different generations have pushed through, widened, and altered according to their own needs, none of them particularly concerned with preservation.