Whoever commissioned it, or whoever it was meant to mark, left no name behind. The carving is accomplished, the stone substantial, and the silence around its identity complete.

The slab dates to the 16th or 17th century and was first noted in print by the Reverend Comerford in 1883, who described it as bearing elaborate armorial bearings but no discoverable inscription. He placed it at the east end of the church interior. When O. Davies recorded it again in 1943, the description was almost identical, the armorial relief still legible, the inscription still absent, the location still given as the east end. That detail turns out to have been an error repeated across both accounts: the slab actually lies at the west end of the church, flat on the ground at the centre of the base of the west wall. It is a small but telling instance of how early field records, however careful, can embed a mistake that subsequent observers simply inherit. The church itself has its own point of interest: Comerford also noted a Gothic doorway at the south-east end with the date 1460 cut into the inner turn of the arch, described as looking freshly engraved even in the 1880s.

The armorial shield, carved in relief at the top of the slab, is the only decoration present. An armorial graveslab of this kind was typically commissioned by a family of some local standing, the heraldic device serving in place of written identification for those who would have recognised the arms immediately. That the bearings remain unidentified adds an extra layer of obscurity to a stone that was already, by design or accident, stripped of its name.