That accumulated rubble is, in a quiet way, the most telling thing about them: these structures have not so much fallen as been swallowed, gradually overwhelmed by the ordinary agricultural tidying of the landscape around them. What lies underneath is a pair of conjoined huts built in corbelled drystone construction, a technique in which stones are laid in overlapping courses that lean progressively inward until they meet at the top, requiring no mortar and no timber.

The antiquarian George Victor Du Noyer visited in 1858 and left a description precise enough to work from even now. He recorded one hut as circular in plan, with a diameter of approximately 5.5 metres, and the other as D-shaped, measuring roughly 5.5 by 4.26 metres. The two were connected by a lintelled communicating passage, a low internal doorway spanned by a single flat stone, and the circular hut had its own entrance opening to the exterior. R. A. S. Macalister, writing in 1899, counted three huts at the site rather than two, suggesting either that a third structure was already becoming harder to distinguish, or that the two observers were reading the same remains differently. The discrepancy has never been fully resolved. Hut sites of this corbelled type are found elsewhere on the Dingle Peninsula and along the wider Atlantic fringe of Ireland, where the tradition of dry stone building persisted for centuries, though assigning precise dates to individual examples remains difficult without excavation.