The structures look, at first glance, relatively recent. But appearances in archaeology are rarely the whole story, and here they may be masking something considerably older beneath them.

A researcher named Henry, writing in 1957, recorded three round stone huts within the same area of the site, suggesting that whatever is visible today may rest on the footprint of earlier buildings. The relationship between the later structures and those earlier huts remains unresolved. It is the kind of ambiguity that makes a site quietly interesting: the ground holds layers of use, and the more recent activity has not erased what came before so much as settled on top of it, obscuring the timeline without quite cancelling it.