The hut is tiny, just 2.2 metres in diameter, defined by a collapsed drystone wall, a construction technique using stones laid without mortar, that still stands roughly 0.3 metres high and 0.9 metres thick. What makes the site quietly compelling is not the hut alone but what surrounds it: its eastern arc butts directly against a second hut site, and its northern wall shares a face with the enclosing boundary itself, suggesting a deliberate, close-packed arrangement rather than a solitary dwelling placed at random on open ground.

The relationship between the structures gives some sense of how the site may once have functioned. A further hut sits approximately 28 metres to the southeast, and the traces of a relict field boundary, the faint earthwork remains of a former agricultural division of land, survive around 80 metres in the same direction. Together these elements point to a small settlement cluster, perhaps a seasonal grazing station of the kind common across upland Ireland, where people and animals moved to higher ground in summer months under a practice known as booleying. The enclosure within which this particular hut sits, classified separately in the record, would have provided some protection for livestock as well as a defined domestic space. None of the sources assign a precise date to the complex, but this type of drystone enclosure and associated hut grouping is typically associated with early medieval or later pastoral activity in the Irish uplands.