The arrangement is modest in scale, roughly two metres east to west and one metre north to south, and the stones themselves are not particularly imposing. What makes it quietly arresting is the uncertainty surrounding it. Nobody knows quite what it is, or whether it is old at all.

The structure sits on a slight ridge, which might suggest a deliberate placement, since elevated ground was often chosen for prehistoric monuments to mark territory, honour the dead, or orient a structure with the landscape. The three uprights define the east, south, and west sides of the rectangle, with the southern stone being the tallest at around 0.8 metres. None of the stones are securely set in the ground, which complicates any attempt to read them as the remnant of something more substantial. The prostrate slab to the south-west may have once formed the missing fourth side, or it may have no original connection to the upright stones at all. The possibility that the whole arrangement is relatively recent, perhaps a field boundary fragment or some functional farm feature, cannot be ruled out. That ambiguity is recorded honestly, and it is part of what makes the site worth thinking about.