When the Ordnance Survey recorded it in 1841, the site appeared as a square embanked enclosure, roughly twenty metres a side. By the time surveyors returned in 1923, the same feature had been rendered as a circular mound of around ten metres in diameter. The ground itself has not settled the matter: what stands there now is a sub-rectangular earthen mound, approximately 16.5 metres north to south and 14 metres east to west, rising to a height of 2.35 metres. Whether the shifting representations reflect genuine change to the earthwork, differences in surveying convention, or simply the judgement of individual cartographers on two separate days, no one has yet said definitively.

At the north-east corner of the mound, the northern end of a small rectangular structure survives, built of roughly coursed mortared stonework standing just under a metre high and half a metre wide. Immediately to the south of it runs a low dry-stone wall, roughly 5.6 metres long on a north-south axis, only 34 centimetres high but a substantial 1.4 metres in width. Dry-stone construction, which uses no mortar and relies on the careful fitting of stones, is common across the Irish landscape in field boundaries and ancillary farm buildings, so its presence here is not in itself unusual; what is curious is its relationship to the mortared structure beside it, suggesting either different building phases or different functions on the same raised platform. Just to the west of the dry-stone wall sits an ovoid depression, roughly three metres by two, scooped about 37 centimetres into the surface. The record was compiled by Denis Power and uploaded in August 2011.

The mound sits in pasture on gently undulating ground, which makes approach straightforward in terms of terrain, though livestock may be present. The top of the mound itself is covered by a dense, impenetrable growth of briars, so any close inspection is limited to the visible stonework at the north-east corner and the perimeter of the earthwork. Scattered stones are evident across the surface beneath the briar cover, suggesting further structural remains that have not been recorded or excavated. A visit in late autumn or winter, when vegetation dies back even partially, would offer a clearer view of the mound's profile and the stonework that remains exposed.