It measures twenty-seven metres in length, sixteen metres in width, and rises to about two and a half metres at its highest point, which is enough to give it a quiet presence on the landscape without announcing itself dramatically. The ground drops away sharply to the south, so whatever the mound once signified, its builders chose a position with genuine command of the surrounding terrain.

The site was recorded in 1942 by the field survey unit of the Archaeological Society at University College Dublin, a mid-century effort to catalogue earthworks across the country before agricultural change and development could erase them entirely. That survey gave the mound its dimensions, but it did not resolve the deeper questions about origin or function. A later reference by Healy, published in 1975, noted that no upstanding structural remains were visible, which places this firmly in the category of earthworks that survive as shape rather than as stone or timber. Mounds of this kind can represent anything from prehistoric burial monuments to later medieval administrative or ceremonial features, and without excavation it is not possible to say which applies here.

The site sits on pastureland, so access is not guaranteed and the land should be treated with the consideration owed to any working farm. The mound itself offers no dramatic focal point to aim for once you arrive; its interest lies in reading the landform and its relationship to the slope falling away to the south. Ground-level observation is the main tool available to a visitor, and the absence of surface features is itself part of what makes the site worth thinking about. It is the kind of place that rewards patience and a decent map rather than expectations of visible archaeology.