What survives today is modest almost to the point of invisibility: a low, grass-covered ring of collapsed stonework, roughly six metres across, sitting at the tip of a long sloping promontory. A shallow depression running across the neck of the headland is the only hint that something once marked this place off from the land behind it, the kind of boundary feature typical of a promontory fort, where a defensive bank or ditch cuts across the landward approach to make use of the sea cliffs on either side as natural protection.

The site was recorded in 2003 by Casey, who noted that the sloping sea stacks to the south suggest the headland was once considerably larger than it now appears. Coastal erosion has a habit of making early sites seem more fragmentary than they actually were, and this is likely one of those cases. The surrounding land carries its own quiet archaeology: traces of earlier cultivation remain visible in undrained and uncleared pockets of fertile pasture, hints of agricultural activity that may predate or postdate whoever occupied the hut site at the promontory's tip. Higher ground to the north overlooks the entire area, which raises the question of how defensible or how deliberately chosen this particular spot really was. The designation of "possible" promontory fort reflects genuine uncertainty; the shallow depression at the neck is suggestive rather than conclusive, and without excavation it is difficult to say whether this was ever a fortified enclosure in any meaningful sense or simply a place where someone once built a small round structure close to the edge of the land.