It shows no above-ground structure, no stones, no mound, and it has no interpretive sign. The only way most people have ever noticed it is through aerial imagery, where it appeared clearly on Apple Maps in June 2018, a ghostly ring resolved from the crop and soil as if drawn with a compass. This is a ring-ditch, a type of monument defined by a circular or near-circular ditch cut into the ground, and though they are often associated with prehistoric funerary or ritual activity, the precise function of any individual example can be difficult to determine without excavation.

This particular ring-ditch measures roughly 17 metres in external diameter, with the ditch itself approximately one metre wide. Those are modest dimensions, understated even, but the feature sits within a broader landscape of similar monuments. Another ring-ditch lies around 530 metres to the south-west, catalogued separately in the Sites and Monuments Record as DU005-092. Whether the two are directly related, either chronologically or functionally, is unknown, but their proximity is unlikely to be coincidental. Additional linear ditches are visible to the south and west of this example, possibly associated with the ring-ditch, though again their relationship has not been established through fieldwork. The record was compiled by Tom Condit and uploaded to the national database in April 2020.

The site sits within a large arable field, which means access is not straightforward and will depend on the agricultural calendar and the co-operation of whoever farms the land. There is nothing to see at ground level in the conventional sense; the monument only becomes legible from above, or in certain light conditions when crop marks or soil variations are visible across a field. Visitors with an interest in this kind of archaeology are better served by studying the aerial imagery first, using it to orient themselves to the likely location within the field. The linear features to the south and west are worth looking for if conditions allow, since they hint at a more complex pattern of ancient land use than the ring alone might suggest.