Ringfort (Rath), Carrickittle, Co. Limerick
Co. Limerick |
Ringforts
At some point between the early medieval period and the mid-nineteenth century, a ringfort in County Limerick was quietly recast in the official record as a pond.
When the Ordnance Survey produced its six-inch map of the area in 1840, the circular earthwork at Carrickittle was rendered in blue, as though it held water rather than history. It is the kind of cartographic slip that raises questions: was the fosse, the broad ditch that encircles the raised platform, seasonally flooded? Was the surveyor simply uncertain? Whatever the explanation, the misidentification sat uncorrected in the archive for over a century.
A ringfort, sometimes called a rath, is one of the most common archaeological monument types in Ireland, typically a circular enclosure defined by one or more banks and ditches, used as a farmstead during the early medieval period, roughly 500 to 1000 AD. The example at Carrickittle was described in detail by O'Kelly in 1944, who recorded it as a circular raised platform surrounded by a fosse, with an entrance on the eastern side approached by both a causeway and a ramp. The platform rises to roughly 1.8 metres above the bottom of the fosse at its greatest height, and the overall diameter of the monument reaches approximately 45.7 metres. These are reasonably substantial proportions, and the survival of the causeway and ramp as recognisable features gives the site a degree of structural legibility that many comparable earthworks have lost to farming and time.
Carrickittle is a small townland in the south of County Limerick, and like many such sites, this ringfort sits in an agricultural landscape where access and condition can change with the seasons. The earthwork itself is most legible when surrounding vegetation is low, and the eastern entrance, with its causeway feature, is the detail most worth seeking out on the ground. Because the monument was once mapped as a pond, older local references may be unreliable, so cross-referencing with the National Monuments Service record is advisable before visiting. The site is typical of the category in form, but its particular documentary history, misread, overlooked, then formally described only in 1944, gives it a quiet oddity worth pausing over.