What makes this particular example quietly interesting is not grandeur but ambiguity: the bank that once defined its perimeter has been partially absorbed into an ordinary field boundary, the original entrance has been lost entirely, and at the centre there sits an irregularly shaped stony area whose purpose, noted in a 1976 report, remains unknown.

The site measures approximately 52 metres north to south and 49 metres east to west, making it a reasonably substantial example of its type. A low bank of earth and stone, roughly 2.6 metres wide and between 0.2 and 0.4 metres high, traces most of the circuit, and remnants of a shallow external fosse, essentially a ditch dug outside the bank to reinforce the enclosure, survive on the southern and western sides. From the northeast around through the east to the south-southwest, the bank has been modified and incorporated into the modern field system, which accounts for much of what has been lost. Inside the enclosure, the ground level rises noticeably from the bank edge towards the centre, and a low scarp, a slight but readable step in the ground surface, runs briefly westward from near the middle before turning northward back towards the bank. These are the kind of subtle earthwork details that reward patient observation rather than a casual glance.

The site is densely overgrown with scrub, which means the earthworks are easier to read in winter or early spring when vegetation is lower. The interior mound and its central stony area are the features most worth looking for, though reaching them through the scrub requires some persistence.