What makes it worth pausing over is the way the modern countryside has grafted itself onto an ancient structure: field boundaries radiate outward from the bank itself, suggesting that whoever laid out those later divisions simply accepted the ringfort as a fixed point in the landscape and worked around it. A lane skirts the exterior along the northwest to southeast arc, doing the same thing. The living farm and the ancient enclosure have arrived at a kind of informal accommodation.

The rath, as this type of earthwork enclosure is properly called, is roughly circular, measuring about 30 metres across. It is defined partly by an earthen bank and partly by a scarp, a natural or cut slope that substitutes for a built bank along the southern and eastern portions of the circuit. The bank itself stands to an exterior height of just under one and a half metres, and carries traces of stone-facing on its northeastern side, an indication that at least some of its construction involved more deliberate effort than simply piling earth. A possible entrance survives in the northwest arc, though it is now heavily obscured by overgrowth. Perhaps the most intriguing detail is the presence of a possible souterrain in the northeast quadrant. Souterrains are underground stone-lined passages or chambers associated with early medieval settlement, typically interpreted as places of storage or refuge, and their presence within a ringfort is a fairly reliable sign of sustained habitation rather than purely defensive or agricultural use.

The interior is concave, sloping gently upward toward the bank, which gives the enclosed space a slight bowl-like quality that would be noticeable on the ground. Gaps in the bank at the west and southeast may be later breaks rather than original features. The overgrowth covering the probable entrance and much of the circuit means the full extent of the structure is not immediately legible from a casual glance, but the relationship between the earthwork and the field system around it rewards a slower look.