What makes this particular example quietly interesting is not dramatic preservation but the accumulated detail: the earthen bank, measuring roughly 32 metres north to south and 27.6 metres east to west, is low but still clearly legible in the landscape, with stones pushing through intermittently along its inner face at the north-west and north-east. On the south-west arc, the bank has been absorbed into a later field wall, a common fate for these structures, where later generations found ready-made boundaries and repurposed them without ceremony.

The site carries a few features worth reading carefully. A low terrace, about five metres wide, runs along the outer edge of the bank on the eastern half of the rath, defined by a gentle scarp. This may be the degraded remains of an outer enclosing element, which would suggest the site was once more elaborately defended or delineated than its present modest profile implies. There are also two narrow, eroded breaks in the bank, one at the north and one at the north-north-east, each roughly a metre wide, possibly the remnants of original entrances. More intriguing still is what lies beneath the surface: local knowledge holds that a souterrain sits in the northern half of the interior. A souterrain is an underground stone-lined passage or chamber, typically associated with ringforts and thought to have served for storage or as a refuge. Its presence here is betrayed only by a shallow depression in an area of uneven, hummocky ground, the kind of subtle irregularity that is easy to overlook unless you know what you are looking for.