The enclosure measures roughly six metres by four metres, and whoever built it chose, whether deliberately or simply out of convenience, to incorporate the stones rather than work around them. The result is an accidental layering of the landscape: a structure of entirely practical intent wrapped around monuments that predate it by millennia.

The standing stones themselves, catalogued as a pair, were documented by de Valera and Ó Nualláin in their 1972 survey of megalithic monuments. Standing stones of this kind are common enough across Ireland, though their original purpose remains genuinely uncertain; they may have marked boundaries, ritual sites, or astronomical alignments, and in many cases no clear answer has emerged. What is more unusual here is the secondary enclosure built around them. Scholars have considered whether it might represent a hut-site, a small shelter used by a person rather than animals, but the more likely reading is that it served as a sheepfold, a low walled pen for managing livestock on the open hillside. Drystone construction, which uses no mortar and relies entirely on the careful placement of stones for stability, was the standard approach for such field structures in upland pastoral areas. Whoever built this fold either saw no conflict in using ancient monuments as convenient ready-made walls, or perhaps found something useful in their presence.