Souterrain, Cahirguillamore, Co. Limerick
Co. Limerick |
Settlement Sites
Some archaeological features are more notable for what they might be than for what they demonstrably are.
Within the interior of a cashel, a roughly circular stone enclosure of early medieval origin, in the former Deerpark of the Cahir Guillamore House demesne in County Limerick, there lies something that has resisted easy classification for the better part of a century. The feature in question is, or was, or possibly never was, a souterrain, an underground stone-lined passage or chamber typically associated with early Irish settlement sites, often used for storage or refuge. What makes this particular entry in the archaeological record quietly curious is that the evidence for it rests almost entirely on a single observation made over eighty years ago, and subsequent scrutiny has found nothing to confirm it.
In 1942, the archaeologists Ó Ríordáin and Hunt noted a long, narrow depression in the interior of the cashel and suggested it might represent a collapsed souterrain. Their language was careful rather than confident, framed as possibility rather than identification. The site does not appear on Ordnance Survey Ireland historic mapping at all, which makes that 1942 note the primary documentary trace. When aerial orthoimagery was examined for the period between 2005 and 2012, and again from a Digital Globe image taken in September 2020, no surface trace of any depression could be identified. Compiler Martin Fitzpatrick, who uploaded the record in March 2021, raised a further complicating possibility: the depression Ó Ríordáin and Hunt observed in 1942 may simply have been a ground disturbance associated with an Ordnance Survey trigonometric station, marked on the 1840 edition of the six-inch map as indicating an elevation of 320 feet above ordnance datum, rather than any archaeological feature at all.
The site sits in pasture on what was once the Deerpark of the Cahir Guillamore estate, which limits casual access. The cashel itself, recorded separately in the national monuments record, is the more tangible feature of the two, though even it is not prominently signposted. Anyone with a particular interest in the question of the souterrain would find the landscape as it stands today largely unrevealing; the depression is gone, if it was ever truly there. What remains is a record of uncertainty, a footnote in a 1942 report that raised a question the ground has since declined to answer.