This kind of outlier, a standing stone placed in deliberate relation to a larger ceremonial arrangement yet standing alone, raises more questions than it answers about how such sites were used and understood by the people who built them.

The stone, catalogued as number 5 in the grouping, stands approximately 1.25 metres tall, 96 centimetres broad, and around 59 centimetres wide, with a notably rectangular cross-section and an east-west alignment that may well have been intentional. O'Hare, writing in 1996, placed it roughly 2 metres southwest of stone 3 within the wider complex. Scattered around the site are other stones that have likely ended up where they are through generations of agricultural field clearance rather than any original prehistoric arrangement, which means the landscape immediately surrounding the outlier has been disturbed and reshaped over centuries of farming. Separating what belongs to the original monument from what has simply accumulated nearby is part of what makes sites like this difficult to read.