That last point is not rhetorical modesty; scholars and inspectors have genuinely struggled to account for them. Most stone groupings of this kind follow some detectable logic, whether ceremonial, astronomical, or territorial. At Timoney Hills, with one exception, they simply do not.

By 1936, the Inspector of National Monuments had mapped 221 stones spread across two adjoining townlands, Timoney Hills and Cullaun, noting that they were all of red sandstone or conglomerate and ranged from roughly three to six feet in height. He observed that they appeared to follow no particular arrangement, save for one stone circle in Cullaun. A later survey, published by Stout in 1984 as part of the Archaeological Survey of Ikerrin, counted 245 stones in total, though 70 had already been removed by that point, along with five cairns that have since disappeared entirely. The individual stone catalogued here, marked 6E on the inspector's map, belongs to a cluster of 35 within a single field, of which 12 were still upright when surveyed and 23 had fallen. It had become unlocatable by the time of a later visit, buried under dense scrub growth. That a monument of this scale can quietly vanish beneath vegetation gives some measure of how overlooked the site has been. There is also a complicating question hanging over the whole group: the stones sit within the landscaped estate of Timoney Park, once the property of the Parker-Hutchinson family, and this setting raises the possibility that at least some of the stones may have been arranged or introduced during the estate's ornamental development rather than in prehistory. Whether the entire grouping is ancient, partially rearranged, or something more complicated remains unresolved.