The site appears on an 1903 edition of the Ordnance Survey six-inch map as an enclosure, and as recently as 1938 it was described in Office of Public Works files as consisting of seven upright stones. Today, visiting the spot in its open grassland setting, you would find no visible trace of the enclosure or of any stone circle. The archaeology has either been removed, buried, or simply worn away by time and agricultural use, leaving only the cartographic and documentary ghost of something that was once considered worth recording.

What exactly stood here is uncertain, and that uncertainty is part of what makes the site interesting. The enclosure may have served as a boundary or platform for a stone circle, a prehistoric arrangement of standing stones whose purpose, whether ceremonial, calendrical, or territorial, remains debated by archaeologists. The description of seven upright stones from 1938 suggests the monument was still at least partially legible within living memory, which makes its current invisibility all the more striking. The site sits close to a ringfort, a roughly circular earthen or stone enclosure of the early medieval period typically used as a defended farmstead, located some 45 metres to the east. That proximity hints at a landscape that was meaningful and occupied across very different periods, the prehistoric and the early medieval layered on the same elevated ground.

The high ground itself still offers panoramic views in all directions, which may be exactly why people returned to this spot across the centuries. That quality of the place, open, exposed, commanding, survives even when the stones do not.