The mound sits so close to its neighbour that the two feel deliberately paired, as though whoever raised one was very much aware of the other already standing there.

The feature is classified as a barrow, the general term for a prehistoric burial mound, though the precise nature of this one remains tentative. It was described as a tumulus by the archaeologist M. J. O'Kelly in 1944, who recorded it as a slight, low mound encircled by a fosse, which is a surrounding ditch, cut into the ground. What sets it apart from many examples of the type is the absence of an outer bank; typically, the material dug from the fosse would be piled up to form a raised ring beyond the ditch, but here none survives, if one ever existed. Its overall diameter, fosse included, measures around 18.3 metres. The mound sits immediately to the south-east of a separate earthwork recorded in the national monuments register, and that relationship between the two features, one possibly prehistoric, the other of uncertain but potentially overlapping date, is part of what makes the site of interest beyond its modest scale. The record was compiled by Caimin O'Brien and uploaded to the national database in May 2021, drawing on O'Kelly's original observations alongside more recent aerial photography from Ordnance Survey Ireland and Google Earth imagery taken between 2005 and 2012.

The site lies in working agricultural land, and access would require landowner permission. The mound is low and unassuming, the kind of feature that looks like a natural undulation to an untrained eye, which is precisely why aerial imagery has proved useful in confirming its outline. Visiting in late autumn or winter, when vegetation has died back, gives the best chance of reading the slight rise of the mound and the depression of the surrounding fosse at ground level. The neighbouring earthwork to the north-west provides useful orientation once you are in the field.